If you have been following the markets recently, you have probably noticed how confusing price movements can be, especially when it comes to oil, gold, and energy stocks. Every time there is a geopolitical event, the media immediately provides a narrative that seems logical on the surface. War breaks out, supply is threatened, and therefore prices should rise. That explanation feels comfortable, but when you look at price action through the lens of supply and demand trading, the reality is very different. Markets do not move because of news; they move because of imbalances that were already in place long before the headlines appeared.
👉 If you are new to this approach, I explain the foundations here:
Learn the basics of supply and demand trading
To understand this, we need to go back to 2022, when the Ukraine war started. At that moment, the expectation across the market was very clear. Oil prices should continue rising due to uncertainty and supply disruption. Initially, that expectation seemed correct as oil rallied aggressively. However, what happened next completely contradicted that logic. Oil prices dropped more than fifty percent while the war was still ongoing. If fundamentals were truly driving the market, this should not have happened. The geopolitical situation had not improved, and yet price moved in the opposite direction.
The explanation lies in higher timeframe supply and demand imbalances. On the monthly chart, oil had reached a strong supply zone where institutional selling pressure was already positioned. Once price entered that area, the market reacted exactly as expected, regardless of the news. This is the key concept most traders overlook. The higher timeframe imbalance dictates the move, not the narrative. News simply becomes a story that attempts to explain a move that has already been triggered by these institutional orders.
What makes this even more interesting is the disconnect between oil prices and gasoline prices during that same period. While oil was dropping significantly, petrol prices in many parts of the world remained elevated and, in some cases, continued to rise. This created confusion among traders and consumers alike. If oil was falling, why were fuel prices not following? The answer again lies in the misunderstanding of how markets operate. Price action in financial markets reflects the interaction between supply and demand at different levels of the market, and these do not always translate immediately or directly into consumer pricing.
Fast forward to the current geopolitical tensions involving the United States, Israel, and Iran, and the situation appears to make sense again on the surface. Oil prices have surged above one hundred and twenty dollars, and gasoline prices have increased across Europe. The narrative once again aligns with expectations. However, this alignment is misleading. It creates the illusion that the news is driving the market, when in reality, price is simply reacting to higher timeframe demand imbalances that were already in control before these events escalated.
👉 This is the same principle I apply in all my analyses:
See real market examples using supply and demand
When I analyze crude oil, Brent, or major oil and gas stocks such as Chevron and Shell, I am not focused on geopolitical developments or economic reports. My focus is entirely on price action and the location of supply and demand imbalances on the monthly and weekly timeframes. These levels represent areas where large institutional orders are placed, and once they take control, they dictate the direction of the market. Everything else becomes secondary noise that can distract traders from what truly matters.
This is why many traders struggle when trying to learn to trade stocks, commodities, or forex using fundamental analysis. Fundamentals provide a narrative, but they do not provide timing or precision. Price action trading, on the other hand, reveals where the real decisions are being made. By understanding supply and demand imbalances, traders can identify high-probability areas where price is likely to react, without relying on external information that is often delayed or misleading.
👉 If you want to learn how to read these higher timeframe imbalances step by step:
Start with the Set & Forget Core Strategy
Gold provides another powerful example of this disconnect between narrative and reality. Currently, there is a strong bullish narrative surrounding gold, driven by central bank accumulation and increased demand from countries like China. This creates the impression that prices should continue to rise indefinitely. However, when analyzing gold through supply and demand trading, a different picture emerges. Price is extended on higher timeframes and approaching areas of supply where selling pressure is likely to take control.
This creates a contradiction that many traders find difficult to navigate. On one hand, the media encourages bullish positioning based on fundamentals. On the other hand, price action suggests that the move may be reaching exhaustion. This is where understanding higher timeframe imbalances becomes crucial. Markets do not move based on what should happen; they move based on where supply and demand are out of balance.
Trading based on news is inherently reactive. It places traders in a position where they are always responding to events after the fact. In contrast, trading based on supply and demand imbalances allows for a proactive approach. It enables traders to anticipate potential reactions by identifying key areas where institutional activity is likely to occur. This shift in perspective is fundamental for anyone looking to develop a consistent trading strategy across markets, whether they want to learn to trade forex, learn to trade stocks, or engage in cryptocurrency trading.
Ultimately, the key takeaway is that markets are not driven by headlines, opinions, or geopolitical events. These factors may influence sentiment, but they do not control price. The real drivers of the market are supply and demand imbalances on higher timeframes, and these imbalances are visible directly on the chart. By focusing on price action and understanding which side is in control, traders can remove much of the noise and confusion that comes from relying on external narratives.
This approach requires patience, discipline, and a willingness to ignore the constant flow of information that surrounds financial markets. However, it also provides clarity and consistency that cannot be achieved through fundamental analysis alone. Once you begin to see the market through this lens, you realize that the answers have always been there, hidden in plain sight within the structure of price itself.
👉 If you want to go deeper and learn how to apply this in real markets:
Join the trading community and access full training