Most traders believe stock prices move because of earnings.
It sounds logical. A company reports strong results, the stock should rally. If a company misses expectations, the stock should fall. Financial media has repeated that narrative for decades, and many investors accept it without questioning it.
The problem is that the market doesn’t always follow the script.
Alibaba Group (NYSE: BABA) is currently providing a fascinating example of why traders should be careful when they allow headlines to dominate their decision-making process. Despite disappointing earnings releases in both March and May 2026, Alibaba stock continues to hold its gains and remains significantly higher after reaching a major monthly demand imbalance around the $120 area.
For many traders, that creates confusion. How can a stock continue to perform well if the news appears negative?
The answer may be uncomfortable because it challenges one of Wall Street’s favourite myths. Markets are often driven more by institutional positioning, supply and demand imbalances, and price location than by the latest earnings headline.
And that distinction can make a huge difference for anyone trying to learn how to trade stocks successfully.
One of the first things new traders learn is how to read earnings reports, analyst ratings, economic forecasts, and financial news. There is nothing wrong with understanding those factors. The problem begins when traders assume those factors are the primary reason stocks move.
The reality is that markets are auction mechanisms. Buyers and sellers are constantly negotiating value. When large institutions decide a stock offers value at a certain price, they often begin accumulating positions regardless of whether the latest news cycle is positive or negative.
This is where many retail traders get themselves into trouble. They spend hours trying to understand why a stock moved yesterday instead of focusing on where institutional money may become interested tomorrow.
By the time a financial journalist explains a market move, the move has usually already happened. The institutions were making decisions weeks or months earlier while everyone else was still debating headlines.
Alibaba provides an excellent case study. If earnings were truly the dominant force controlling price, the stock should have struggled significantly after its recent reports. Instead, buyers continued showing interest after price reached a major monthly demand area.
That tells us something important. The location of price may be more important than the latest news release.
One of the biggest differences between successful swing traders and struggling traders is the timeframe they choose to analyse.
Most retail traders spend the majority of their time staring at small charts. Five-minute charts. Fifteen-minute charts. One-hour charts. They become obsessed with every candle, every pullback, and every headline.
Meanwhile, the larger timeframe continues quietly controlling the bigger picture.
Imagine trying to understand the plot of a movie by watching only ten seconds at a time. You would see movement, action, and drama, but you would have no idea what was actually happening. That is exactly how many traders approach the market.
The monthly chart provides context. It reveals where institutions have historically become aggressive buyers or sellers. It highlights major supply and demand imbalances that can influence price for months or even years.
Alibaba’s rally began after reaching a significant monthly demand level near $120. From a supply and demand perspective, that is not a random location. It is the type of area where large participants may view the stock as undervalued relative to future expectations.
When that happens, news becomes less important than many traders assume.
The market starts paying attention to order flow rather than opinions.
This is one of the reasons I often tell traders that swing trading and intraday trading are completely different businesses.
An intraday trader may be concerned about what happened during the last earnings release, the latest economic report, or the next market open. Their world revolves around short-term movement.
A swing stock trader should be thinking differently.
The goal of swing trading is not to capture every small fluctuation. The goal is to participate in larger directional moves that can last weeks or months. To achieve that, traders need to focus on the forces that actually drive those moves.
That usually means paying far more attention to weekly and monthly charts than to daily headlines.
Alibaba stock demonstrates this perfectly. While short-term traders are debating earnings reports, the larger timeframe continues telling a very different story. Demand appeared at a significant monthly level, and price responded accordingly.
This does not guarantee future gains. Nothing in trading is guaranteed. However, it does remind us that bigger timeframe imbalances often carry more weight than short-term news events.
Every year, investors search for the best stocks to buy. Financial publications publish endless lists of top stocks for 2026, top growth stocks, top technology stocks, and top investment opportunities.
Most of those lists focus heavily on fundamentals.
Those factors may have value, but they rarely tell the entire story.
A stock can have excellent fundamentals and still fall. A stock can have disappointing earnings and still rally. Markets are not nearly as predictable as financial textbooks would like us to believe.
Alibaba is becoming interesting because it combines a globally recognised technology company with a strong technical location on the larger timeframe charts.
Whether it ultimately becomes one of the top-performing stocks of 2026 remains to be seen. Nobody knows the future. Anyone claiming certainty about future prices is selling something, and it probably isn’t wisdom.
What traders can observe, however, is that Alibaba reacted positively to a significant demand imbalance while many investors remained focused on negative headlines.
That observation alone makes the stock worthy of attention.
The Alibaba setup also highlights an important lesson for traders using options strategies.
Many options traders become obsessed with earnings events because implied volatility often increases before earnings announcements. This creates opportunities, but it can also create expensive mistakes.
A trader can have the correct opinion about earnings and still lose money. That surprises many beginners.
They assume being right about the news should automatically translate into profits. Unfortunately, options trading involves much more than predicting whether earnings will beat expectations.
Location matters. Price structure matters. Supply and demand matter.
A trader buying call options near a major monthly demand level may have a completely different probability profile than someone buying calls after an extended rally. The same logic applies to put options.
The chart often tells a more useful story than the headlines.
That doesn’t mean fundamentals are irrelevant. It simply means they should not be analysed in isolation. The market is far more complex than a simple good-news-versus-bad-news equation.
Human beings love stories. We naturally want explanations for everything.
The financial industry understands this perfectly. Entire media businesses are built around providing explanations for market movements. The problem is that explanations and causes are not always the same thing.
That is why traders must be careful not to confuse narratives with reality. The reality is visible on the chart. Price reached a monthly demand level.
Buyers appeared. The stock rallied. Everything else is secondary.
Alibaba stock is reminding traders of a lesson that the market teaches repeatedly, but many investors refuse to learn.
Markets move because buyers and sellers disagree on value, and when large institutions decide a stock offers value at a particular location, their actions often matter far more than the latest news cycle.
For stock traders interested in swing trading, stock market analysis, price action trading, options strategies, and learning how to trade stocks using supply and demand imbalances, Alibaba offers an excellent educational example.
The next time a financial headline tells you exactly why a stock moved, remember that the market may have made that decision long before the headline was written.
And judging by Alibaba’s behaviour in 2026, demand appears far more interested in the stock than the earnings headlines would suggest.